Supplementation strategies for forage-fed beef steers

dc.citation.epage28en_US
dc.citation.spage25en_US
dc.contributor.authorHunter, R.D.
dc.contributor.authorNutsch, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorDrouillard, James S.
dc.contributor.authorBlasi, Dale A.
dc.contributor.authoreidjdrouillen_US
dc.contributor.authoreiddblasien_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-20T21:36:25Z
dc.date.available2010-08-20T21:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-20T21:36:25Z
dc.date.published2000en_US
dc.description.abstractA comparison was made of different supplementation strategies for steer calves wintered on brome hay for 109 days. Treatments consisted of no supplement, 1.33 lb/head daily of a 30% protein range cube, a commercially available free-choice block supplement containing 40% crude protein (19% as non-protein nitrogen), and a soy-based block supplement containing soy solubles and full-fat soybeans with 40% crude protein (25% as nonprotein nitrogen). Following the backgrounding phase, steers were placed onto finishing rations and fed for an additional 152 days before being slaughtered. Gain during the growing phase was greater for all supplemented cattle than for unsupplemented controls. Cattle fed blocks or no supplement tended to compensate during the finishing phase, suggesting that differences in gastrointestinal tract fill may have impacted body weights at the end of the back grounding phase. When performance was evaluated over the entire 261-day trial, cattle fed blocks were more efficient than controls, whereas efficiencies of cattle fed range cubes were essentially equal to those of cattle that previously received no supplement. Additionally, soybean solubles and full-fat soybeans were viable alternatives to traditional ingredients for manufacturing free-choice block supplements.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2000, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 3, 2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4653
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 2000en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 00-287-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 850en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectGrowing cattleen_US
dc.subjectForagesen_US
dc.subjectBlocksen_US
dc.titleSupplementation strategies for forage-fed beef steersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle00pg25-28.pdf
Size:
27.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: