Individual differences in impulsive and risky choice: effects of environmental rearing conditions

dc.citation.doi10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.024en_US
dc.citation.epage127en_US
dc.citation.jtitleBehavioural Brain Researchen_US
dc.citation.spage115en_US
dc.citation.volume269en_US
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Kimberly
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Andrew T.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Aaron P.
dc.contributor.authorKoci, Juraj
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yoonseong
dc.contributor.authoreidkirkpatren_US
dc.contributor.authoreidkocien_US
dc.contributor.authoreidyparken_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T13:44:25Z
dc.date.available2014-07-22T13:44:25Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-01
dc.date.published2014en_US
dc.description.abstractThe present experiment investigated early-rearing environment modulation of individual differences in impulsive and risky choice. Rats were reared in an isolated condition (IC; n = 12), in which they lived alone without novel stimuli, or an enriched condition (EC; n = 12), in which they lived among conspecifics with novel stimuli. The impulsive choice task involved choices between smaller-sooner (SS) versus larger-later (LL) rewards. The risky choice task involved choices between certain-smaller (C-S) versus uncertain-larger (U-L) rewards. Following choice testing, incentive motivation to work for food was measured using a progressive ratio task and correlated with choice behavior. HPLC analyses were conducted to determine how monoamine concentrations within the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAC) related to behavior in different tasks. IC rats were more impulsive than EC rats, but they did not differ in risky choice behavior. However, choice behavior across tasks was significantly correlated (i.e., the more impulsive rats were also riskier). There were no group differences in monoamine levels, but noradrenergic and serotonergic concentrations were significantly correlated with impulsive and risky choice. Furthermore, serotonin and norepinephrine concentrations in the NAC significantly correlated with incentive motivation and the timing of the reward delays within the choice tasks. These results suggest a role for domain general processes in impulsive and risky choice and indicate the importance of the NAC and/or PFC in timing, reward processing, and choice behavior.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/18120
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.024en_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectImpulsive choiceen_US
dc.subjectRisky choiceen_US
dc.subjectDifferential rearingen_US
dc.subjectIndividual differenceen_US
dc.subjectMonoamine concentrationen_US
dc.subjectRaten_US
dc.titleIndividual differences in impulsive and risky choice: effects of environmental rearing conditionsen_US
dc.typeArticle (author version)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KirkpatrickBBR2014.pdf
Size:
177.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: