An evaluation of the status of living collections for plant, environmental, and microbial research

dc.citationMcCluskey, K., Parsons, J. P., Quach, K., & Duke, C. S. (2017). An evaluation of the status of living collections for plant, environmental, and microbial research. Journal of Biosciences, 42(2), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-017-9685-6
dc.citation.doi10.1007/s12038-017-9685-6
dc.citation.epage331
dc.citation.issn0250-5991
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Biosciences
dc.citation.spage42746
dc.citation.volume42
dc.contributor.authorMcCluskey, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorParsons, J. P.
dc.contributor.authorQuach, K.
dc.contributor.authorDuke, C. S.
dc.contributor.authoreidmccluskeyk
dc.contributor.kstateMcCluskey, Kevin
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-30T21:53:41Z
dc.date.available2017-11-30T21:53:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-12
dc.date.published2017
dc.descriptionCitation: McCluskey, K., Parsons, J. P., Quach, K., & Duke, C. S. (2017). An evaluation of the status of living collections for plant, environmental, and microbial research. Journal of Biosciences, 42(2), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-017-9685-6
dc.description.abstractWhile living collections are critical for biological research, support for these foundational infrastructure elements is inconsistent, which makes quality control, regulatory compliance, and reproducibility difficult. In recent years, the Ecological Society of America has hosted several National Science Foundation–sponsored workshops to explore and enhance the sustainability of biological research infrastructure. At the same time, the United States Culture Collection Network has brought together managers of living collections to foster collaboration and information exchange within a specific living collections community. To assess the sustainability of collections, a survey was distributed to collection scientists whose responses provide a benchmark for evaluating the resiliency of these collections. Among the key observations were that plant collections have larger staffing requirements and that living microbe collections were the most vulnerable to retirements or other disruptions. Many higher plant and vertebrate collections have institutional support and several have endowments. Other collections depend on competitive grant support in an era of intense competition for these resources. Opportunities for synergy among living collections depend upon complementing the natural strong engagement with the research communities that depend on these collections with enhanced information sharing, communication, and collective action to keep them sustainable for the future. External efforts by funding agencies and publishers could reinforce the advantages of having professional management of research resources across every discipline. © 2017 Indian Academy of Sciences
dc.description.versionArticle: Version of Record
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/38411
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-017-9685-6
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttp://www.ias.ac.in/public/Resources/Journals/Information_for_Authors/pactform.pdf
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.subjectGenetics
dc.subjectInterdisciplinary Science
dc.subjectMicrobiology
dc.subjectNatural Resources
dc.subjectBiology
dc.titleAn evaluation of the status of living collections for plant, environmental, and microbial research
dc.typeText

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0321-0331.pdf
Size:
645.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format