Efficacy and stability of integrating fungicide and cultivar resistance to manage Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol in wheat

dc.citationWillyerd, K., . . . & Paul, P. (2013). Efficacy and Stability of Integrating Fungicide and Cultivar Resistance to Manage Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Wheat. Plant Disease, 96(7), 957-967. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-11-0763
dc.citation.doi10.1094/PDIS-09-11-0763en_US
dc.citation.epage967en_US
dc.citation.issn0191-2917
dc.citation.issue7en_US
dc.citation.jtitlePlant Diseaseen_US
dc.citation.spage957en_US
dc.citation.volume96en_US
dc.contributor.authorWillyerd, K. T.
dc.contributor.authorLi, C.
dc.contributor.authorMadden, L. V.
dc.contributor.authorBradley, C. A.
dc.contributor.authorBergstrom, G. C.
dc.contributor.authorSweets, L. E.
dc.contributor.authorMcMullen, M.
dc.contributor.authorRansom, J. K.
dc.contributor.authorGrybauskas, A.
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, L.
dc.contributor.authorWegulo, S. N.
dc.contributor.authorHershman, D. E.
dc.contributor.authorWise, K.
dc.contributor.authorBockus, William W.
dc.contributor.authorGroth, D.
dc.contributor.authorDill-Macky, R.
dc.contributor.authorMilus, E.
dc.contributor.authorEsker, P. D.
dc.contributor.authorWaxman, K. D.
dc.contributor.authorAdee, E. A.
dc.contributor.authorEbelhar, S. E.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, B. G.
dc.contributor.authorPaul, P. A.
dc.contributor.authoreidbockusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-01T20:08:22Z
dc.date.available2012-08-01T20:08:22Z
dc.date.issued2012-06-05
dc.date.published2012en_US
dc.descriptionCitation: Willyerd, K., . . . & Paul, P. (2013). Efficacy and Stability of Integrating Fungicide and Cultivar Resistance to Manage Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Wheat. Plant Disease, 96(7), 957-967. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-11-0763
dc.description.abstractIntegration of host resistance and prothioconazole + tebuconazole fungicide application at anthesis to manage Fusarium head blight (FHB) and deoxynivalenol (DON) in wheat was evaluated using data from over 40 trials in 12 U.S. states. Means of FHB index (index) and DON from up to six resistance class–fungicide management combinations per trial (susceptible treated [S_TR] and untreated [S_UT]; moderately susceptible treated [MS_TR] and untreated [MS_UT]; moderately resistant treated [MR_TR] and untreated [MR_UT]) were used in multivariate meta-analyses, and mean log response ratios across trials were estimated and transformed to estimate mean percent control (C) due to the management combinations relative to S_UT. All combinations led to a significant reduction in index and DON (P < 0.001). MR_TR was the most effective combination, with a of 76% for index and 71% for DON, followed by MS_TR (71 and 58%, respectively), MR_UT (54 and 51%, respectively), S_TR (53 and 39%, respectively), and MS_UT (43 and 30%, respectively). Calculations based on the principle of treatment independence showed that the combination of fungicide application and resistance was additive in terms of percent control for index and DON. Management combinations were ranked based on percent control relative to S_UT within each trial, and nonparametric analyses were performed to determine management combination stability across environments (trials) using the Kendall coefficient of concordance (W). There was a significant concordance of management combinations for both index and DON (P < 0.001), indicating a nonrandom ranking across environments and relatively low variability in the within-environment ranking of management combinations. MR_TR had the highest mean rank (best control relative to S_UT) and was one of the most stable management combinations across environments, with low rank stability variance (0.99 for index and 0.67 for DON). MS_UT had the lowest mean rank (poorest control) but was also one of the most stable management combinations. Based on Piepho's nonparametric rank-based variance homogeneity U test, there was an interaction of management combination and environment for index (P = 0.011) but not for DON (P = 0.147), indicating that the rank ordering for index depended somewhat on environment. In conclusion, although the magnitude of percent control will likely vary among environments, integrating a single tebuconazole + prothioconazole application at anthesis with cultivar resistance will be a more effective and stable management practice for both index and DON than either approach used alone.en_US
dc.description.versionArticle: Accepted Manuscript
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/14117
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-11-0763en_US
dc.rights© 2012 The American Phytopathological Society . This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en
dc.subjectFusarium head blighten_US
dc.subjectDeoxynivalenolen_US
dc.subjectWheaten_US
dc.subjectHost resistanceen_US
dc.subjectFungicideen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and stability of integrating fungicide and cultivar resistance to manage Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol in wheaten_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Efficacy - publisher's PDF.pdf
Size:
308.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: