Effects of different feeding regimens on growth, longevity, and semen characteristics of working boars in a commercial AI stud

dc.citation.epage30en_US
dc.citation.spage21en_US
dc.contributor.authorSulabo, R.C.
dc.contributor.authorQuackenbush, J.
dc.contributor.authorGoodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.authorTokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorDeRouchey, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorNelssen, Jim L.
dc.contributor.authorDritz, Steven S.
dc.contributor.authoreidgoodbanden_US
dc.contributor.authoreidmtokachen_US
dc.contributor.authoreiddritzen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjderouchen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjnelssenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-06T20:22:31Z
dc.date.available2009-10-06T20:22:31Z
dc.date.issued2009-10-06T20:22:31Z
dc.date.published2008en_US
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the study was to determine the effects of 2 different feeding regimens on growth performance, semen production and quality, and longevity of boars in a commercial AI stud. A total of 30 replacement boars (PIC TR4, 375 lb and 14.2 mo of age) were randomly selected and allotted to 1 of 2 treatments. The control feeding program was the normal feeding program of the stud; boars were fed 6.7 lb/d for the first 8 wk, and then feeding was adjusted according to body condition of the individual boar. For the treatment feeding program, boars were fed 5.8 lb/d in the first 4 wk until boars reached 400 lb; afterward, boars were fed 6.0 lb/d for the duration of the study. Boars were weighed periodically to determine periodic and overall ADG. Semen was collected from each boar once a week for a total duration of 16 mo. Semen production and quality was determined for each ejaculate. Overall, treatment boars were consistently heavier than the control boars throughout the duration of the study because of their higher periodic and overall daily gains. At the end of the test, treatment boars were 32 lb heavier (P < 0.15) than the control boars. A higher proportion of treatment boars (73 vs. 42%) were active at the end of the study, which numerically increased (P > 0.35) average days in the stud (345 vs. 279 d), semen collections (58 vs. 49), and doses produced (1,238 vs. 1,077). There were no differences (P > 0.28) in the volume, sperm cell concentration, sperm cell count, and doses produced per ejaculate between boars fed the two feeding programs. Likewise, motility rates and proportion of normal cells in ejaculates were similar (P > 0.33) between boars fed the control and treatment feeding program. In conclusion, AI boars can be fed to a set feeding level to achieve targeted weight gains to influence longevity without affecting semen production and quality.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, 2008, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/1783
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 2008en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 09-074-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1001en_US
dc.subjectBoarsen_US
dc.subjectGrowth rateen_US
dc.subjectLongevityen_US
dc.subjectSemen characteristicsen_US
dc.titleEffects of different feeding regimens on growth, longevity, and semen characteristics of working boars in a commercial AI studen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Effects of Different Feeding Regimens on Growth Longevity.pdf
Size:
201.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections