Puberty and breeding performance of beef heifers developed at different rates of gain

dc.citation.epage103en_US
dc.citation.spage101en_US
dc.contributor.ORCIDorcid.org/0000-0002-9150-169X
dc.contributor.authorMinton, J. Ernest
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Robert T., Jr.
dc.contributor.authorCoughlin, C.M.
dc.contributor.authorCochran, R.C.
dc.contributor.authoreidemintonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T20:56:49Z
dc.date.available2010-09-17T20:56:49Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-17T20:56:49Z
dc.date.published1994en_US
dc.description.abstractCrossbred heifers (546 lb initial body weight) were developed in drylot and limit-fed a corn, corn silage diet to gain .5 (n = 14), 1.0 (n = 15), 1.5 (n = 14), or 2.0 lb/d (n = 15) from Dec. 7, 1992 until the onset of the breeding season, May 3, 1993. Actual daily gains averaged 1.0, 1.4, 1.8, and 2.1 lb/d, respectively. Age at puberty was not affected by feeding treatment. At the onset of the breeding season, nutritional treatment had a linear effect on body condition score, ribeye fat thickness (both P<.01), and reproductive tract score (P<.05), all increasing with increasing rate of gain. Nutritional treatment had a quadratic effect on pelvic area (P<.05), which averaged 190.6, 201.6, 206.5, and 205.3 cm2 for heifers fed to gain .5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 lb/d, respectively. At the conclusion of the development period, estrus was synchronized, and heifers were inseminated artificially at estrus for 45 days and, if open, mated naturally for another 17 d. Overall pregnancy rates were similar among heifers fed to gain .5, 1.0, and 1.5 lb/d (92.9, 93.3, and 92.9%, respectively), and all tended to be greater (P<.09) than the rate for heifers fed to gain 2.0 lb/d (66.7%). In summary, NRC recommendations underestimated gain of limit-fed heifers at lower predicted rates of gain. Thus, even though heifers fed to gain only .5 lb/d had lower body condition scores and reproductive tract scores at the onset of the breeding season, their actual body weight gains (1.0 lb/d) were sufficient for normal onset of puberty and subsequent conception. In addition, heifers fed to achieve relatively high rates of gain (2.0 lb/d) during development may have had impaired fertility.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1994, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 4, 1994en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4982
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1994en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 94-373-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 704en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectBeef heifersen_US
dc.subjectPubertyen_US
dc.subjectHeifer developmenten_US
dc.titlePuberty and breeding performance of beef heifers developed at different rates of gainen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle94pg101-103.pdf
Size:
16.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: