Cosmological parameter inference from galaxy clustering: the effect of the posterior distribution of the power spectrum

dc.citation.doi10.1093/mnras/stv2307
dc.citation.epage2581
dc.citation.issn0035-8711
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.jtitleMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
dc.citation.spage2573
dc.citation.volume455
dc.contributor.authorKalus, B.
dc.contributor.authorPercival, W. J.
dc.contributor.authorSamushia, Lado
dc.contributor.authoreidlado
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T17:31:10Z
dc.date.available2016-09-20T17:31:10Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-21
dc.date.published2015
dc.descriptionCitation: Kalus, B., Percival, W. J., & Samushia, L. (2016). YCosmological parameter inference from galaxy clustering: the effect of the posterior distribution of the power spectrum. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 455(3), 2573-2581. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2307
dc.description.abstractWe consider the shape of the posterior distribution to be used when fitting cosmological models to power spectra measured from galaxy surveys. At very large scales, Gaussian posterior distributions in the power do not approximate the posterior distribution P-R we expect for a Gaussian density field delta(k), even if we vary the covariance matrix according to the model to be tested. We compare alternative posterior distributions with P-R, both mode-by-mode and in terms of expected measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity parametrized by f(NL). Marginalising over a Gaussian posterior distribution P-f with fixed covariance matrix yields a posterior mean value of f(NL) which, for a data set with the characteristics of Euclid, will be underestimated by Delta f(NL) = 0.4, while for the data release 9 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS DR9; Ahn et al.) it will be underestimated by Delta f(NL) = 19.1. Adopting a different form of the posterior function means that we do not necessarily require a different covariance matrix for each model to be tested: this dependence is absorbed into the functional form of the posterior. Thus, the computational burden of analysis is significantly reduced.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/34006
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2307
dc.rightsThis article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2015 The Authors, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
dc.rights.urihttp://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/access-purchase/rights-and-permissions/self-archiving-policyp.html
dc.subjectMethods: Statistical
dc.subjectInflation
dc.subjectLarge-Scale Structure Of Universe
dc.subjectPrimordial Non-Gaussianity
dc.subjectOscillation Spectroscopic Survey
dc.subjectSdss-Iii
dc.titleCosmological parameter inference from galaxy clustering: the effect of the posterior distribution of the power spectrum
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MNRAS-2016-Kalus-2573-81.pdf
Size:
686.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format