| dc.contributor.author |
Kingery-Page, Katie |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2011-05-24T14:50:08Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2011-05-24T14:50:08Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2011-05-24 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2097/9185 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Landscape, viewed for centuries by the art world as either an inspirational source for art or as a
kind of decorative art, emerged with a new prominence during the twentieth century. Artists and
landscape architects now share a realm of overlapping practice.
By understanding contemporary art as a body of knowledge and art itself as a ‘mode of
knowledge,’ students, educators, and practitioners of landscape architecture can compete more
effectively with other ‘form-givers’ in 21st century culture.
Art as a mode of knowledge is often disregarded within landscape architecture, in favor of
seemingly more analytical approaches to design research dilemmas. Using examples of 20th and 21st
century urban art, I argue for art as a mode of knowledge relevant to current landscape architecture
practices. I demonstrate the results of applying normative artistic research to a student design project. |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Landscape architecture |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Contemporary art |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Urban art |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Hip hop |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Bronx |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Detroit |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
New Orleans |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Landscape and Contemporary Art:
Overlap, Disregard, and Relevance |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Text |
en_US |
| dc.date.published |
2010 |
en_US |
| dc.citation.epage |
12 |
en_US |
| dc.citation.spage |
1 |
en_US |
| dc.description.conference |
Landscape Legacy: Landscape Architecture and Planning Between Art and Science
May 12-14, 2010, Maastricht, the Netherlands |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid |
kkp |
en_US |