| dc.contributor.author |
Smith, J.F. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Stevenson, J.S. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2011-05-06T20:40:23Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2011-05-06T20:40:23Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2011-05-06 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2097/8835 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Despite the negative effects of milk production
on some reproductive traits, calving
intervals between high- and low-producing
groups varied by only 9 days (414 vs 423).
First-service conception rates were 8 percentage
points greater in the low-producing group
than in the high-producing group. However,
the percentage of cows not yet inseminated that
were more than 120 days in milk was 18 percentage
points greater in the low- than highproducing
herds. When Kansas dairy herds in
the DHIA program are evaluated, the higher
producing herds seem to have lower firstservice
conception rates and more services per
conception. However, managers of high-producing
herds are doing a better job of servicing
cows inseminated earlier in lactation and putting
replacements into the milk string at a younger
age. This occurs because managers of
high-producing herds have reproductive records
and heat detection programs that allow
them to detect a higher percentage of the cows
in heat before 120 days in milk. Fine tuning
the reproductive management program also can
improve the profitability of a dairy operation.
The reproductive losses in high-producing
herds are considerably less than those in lowproducing
herds ($139 vs $203). There are no
magic formulas in establishing a good reproductive
program. Combining good records,
diligent heat detection, and sound artificial
insemination technique can increase the profitability
of a dairy. |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof |
Dairy Day, 1995 |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof |
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 96-106-S |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof |
Report of progress (Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 742 |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Management |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Reproduction |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Management strategies: reproduction |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Conference paper |
en_US |
| dc.date.published |
1995 |
en_US |
| dc.citation.epage |
7 |
en_US |
| dc.citation.spage |
5 |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid |
jfsmith |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid |
jss |
en_US |