Management strategies: reproduction

K-REx Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Smith, J.F.
dc.contributor.author Stevenson, Jeffrey S.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-05-06T20:40:23Z
dc.date.available 2011-05-06T20:40:23Z
dc.date.issued 2011-05-06
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2097/8835
dc.description.abstract Despite the negative effects of milk production on some reproductive traits, calving intervals between high- and low-producing groups varied by only 9 days (414 vs 423). First-service conception rates were 8 percentage points greater in the low-producing group than in the high-producing group. However, the percentage of cows not yet inseminated that were more than 120 days in milk was 18 percentage points greater in the low- than highproducing herds. When Kansas dairy herds in the DHIA program are evaluated, the higher producing herds seem to have lower firstservice conception rates and more services per conception. However, managers of high-producing herds are doing a better job of servicing cows inseminated earlier in lactation and putting replacements into the milk string at a younger age. This occurs because managers of high-producing herds have reproductive records and heat detection programs that allow them to detect a higher percentage of the cows in heat before 120 days in milk. Fine tuning the reproductive management program also can improve the profitability of a dairy operation. The reproductive losses in high-producing herds are considerably less than those in lowproducing herds ($139 vs $203). There are no magic formulas in establishing a good reproductive program. Combining good records, diligent heat detection, and sound artificial insemination technique can increase the profitability of a dairy. en_US
dc.publisher Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Dairy Day, 1995 en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 96-106-S en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Report of progress (Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 742 en_US
dc.subject Management en_US
dc.subject Reproduction en_US
dc.title Management strategies: reproduction en_US
dc.type Conference paper en_US
dc.date.published 1995 en_US
dc.citation.epage 7 en_US
dc.citation.spage 5 en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid jfsmith en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid jss en_US

Files in this item


Files Size Format View

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record