|
K-State Research Exchange >
Food Science Institute >
Faculty Research, Publications, and Presentations >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2097/847
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format |
|---|
| Dikeman1985Accelerated.pdf | 1046Kb | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
|
| Title: | Accelerated versus conventional beef production and processing |
| Authors: | Dikeman, M.E.
Nagele, K.N.
Myers, S.M.
Schalles, R.R.
Kropf, D.H.
Kastner, C.L.
Russo, F.A. |
| Date: | 1985 |
| Type: | Article (publisher version) |
| Journal: | Journal of animal science |
| Volume: | 61 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Starting Page: | 137 |
| Ending Page: | 150 |
| Publisher: | American Society of Animal Science |
| Keywords: | Food science
Performance
Carcasses
Nutrition
Palatability
Electrical treatment
Boning |
| Abstract: | Twenty-four 8-mo-old Angus X Hereford (A X H) reciprocal crossbred steers and 28 3/8 Simmental
X 1/4 Chianina X 3/8 Angus or Hereford steers (S X C) were utilized to study two production
systems and two carcass-processing systems. One-half of each type was allotted by weight
(257.6 kg average) to either an accelerated (ACC) or conventional (CONV) production system. The
ACC system consisted of feeding an 85% concentrate diet for 140 d to A X H cattle and for 180 d
to S X C cattle. The CONV system included backgrounding on prairie hay and sorghum grain for
140 d (A X H) and 183 d (S X C) before finishing on an 82% concentrate diet (116 d for A X H
and 122 d for S X C). The ACC system resulted in lower (P<.05) metabolizable energy to gain
ratios (ME/G) and lower costs of gain. Cattle on the ACC system were slaughtered younger and at
lighter weights (P<.05) and had lower (P<.05) yield grades and quality grades than CONV cattle.
The S X C-ACC cattle had a lower (P<.05) ME/G and tended to have a lower cost of gain than A X
H-ACC cattle. The S X C cattle had lower (P<.05) yield grades and higher (P<.05) percentages of
carcass tissue water than A X H cattle. The S X C cattle had lower (P<.05) quality grades than
A X H cattle. The ACC system resulted in higher (P<.05) longissimus (LD) and semimembranosus
(SM) tenderness scores than the CONV system and equal flavor and juiciness scores. Economic
analyses suggest that S X C-ACe cattle had the lowest break-even live price and lowest cost/kg
retail product. The S X C-CONV cattle tended to have the highest break-even live price, whereas
A X H-CONV cattle had the highest cost/kg retail product. The Ace processing involved electrical
stimulation (ES) of each carcass right side at 1 h postmortem for 2 rain with 400 V, 1 amp and a
frequency of 60 Hz. At 2 h posmaortem the inside round and boneless shortloin were hot-boned
(HB) and chilled 6 d at 2 to 4 C. The control (C) side was chilled 48 h, boned, and muscles stored
4 d at 2 to 4 C. The ESHB resulted in slightly (P>.05) faster LD pH declines. The ESHB LD steaks
had higher (P<.05) juiciness scores, but were not different in flavor or tenderness compared with
C steaks. The ESHB treatment resulted in higher (P<.05) SM shear values and lower (P<.05)
sensory-panel tenderness scores than those of C. The LD display-color scores did not differ (P>.05)
between ESHB and C treatments. The combination of S X C cattle and ACC production was more
attractive economically than CONV production of A X H cattle. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/847 |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty Research, Publications, and Presentations
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format |
|---|
| Dikeman1985Accelerated.pdf | 1046Kb | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
|
All items in K-REx are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
