| dc.contributor.author |
Johnson, S.K. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Jaeger, J.R. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Bolte, J.W. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2011-03-30T16:45:07Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2011-03-30T16:45:07Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2011-03-30 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2097/8115 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Routinely achieving pregnancy rates greater than 50% with fixed-time artificial insemination
(AI) in heifers has been difficult. The Beef Reproduction Task Force recently
added the intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (CIDR)-Select to its list of recommended
fixed-time AI protocols. Research and field trials in Missouri have achieved
AI pregnancy rates in the range of 55% to 60%. Another relatively new protocol is
the 5-day CO-Synch, a timed AI protocol + CIDR that has produced pregnancy rates
similar to or higher than those obtained with the standard 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR
protocol. It is not known whether these two systems differ in terms of estrous response.
The objective of the current study was to compare effects of a long-term, 14-day CIDR-Select
protocol and a 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR protocol on estrous distribution and
AI pregnancy rate in yearling beef heifers. |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof |
Cattlemen’s Day, 2010 |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof |
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 10-170-S |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof |
Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1029 |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof |
Beef Cattle Research, 2010 is known as Cattlemen’s Day, 2010 |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Beef |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
CIDR |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Estrus |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Heifers |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
AI |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Pregnancy rates |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Long-term CIDR program for synchronization
of estrus in beef heifers produces acceptable AI
pregnancy rates |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Conference paper |
en_US |
| dc.date.published |
2010 |
en_US |
| dc.citation.epage |
38 |
en_US |
| dc.citation.spage |
36 |
en_US |
| dc.description.conference |
Cattlemen's Day, 2010, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 5, 2010 |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid |
sandyj |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid |
jrjaeger |
en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid |
bolte2 |
en_US |