Comparison of Ralgro® and Compudose® implants for suckling steer calves

dc.contributor.author	Simms, D.
dc.contributor.author	Dinkel, A.
dc.contributor.author	Jepsen, D.
dc.contributor.author	Schalles, R.
dc.date.accessioned	2011-01-27T14:21:11Z
dc.date.available	2011-01-27T14:21:11Z
dc.date.issued	2011-01-27
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2097/7101
dc.description.abstract	Two field trials were conducted to compare Ralgro and Compudose for suckling steer calves. Ralgro, Ralgro re-implanted, and Compudose increased gain over controls 2.5. 5.9, and 1.5%, respectively, with only the increase from Ralgro re-implanted being signficicant (P<.05). Ralgro reimplanted steers gained more than Compudose steers (P<.05).	en_US
dc.publisher	Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Cattlemen's Day, 1983	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 427	en_US
dc.subject	Beef	en_US
dc.subject	Implants	en_US
dc.subject	Steers	en_US
dc.title	Comparison of Ralgro® and Compudose® implants for suckling steer calves	en_US
dc.type	Conference paper	en_US
dc.date.published	1983	en_US
dc.citation.epage	105	en_US
dc.citation.spage	104	en_US
dc.description.conference	Cattlemen's Day, 2003, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 4, 1983	en_US