Conference:Cattlemen's Day, 1991, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 1, 1991 Starting Page:16, Ending Page:20 Publisher:Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
Sixty Brangus bulls were evaluated live with
two real-time ultrasound instruments to estimate
ribeye area (REA) and 12th rib fat thickness
(FT) every 4 mo beginning at 4 mo and 12 mo
of age, respectively, and continuing until 24 mo
of age. At each evaluation period 10 bulls were
slaughtered to determine actual REA and FT.
Scanned mean FT was accurate (P<.05) at 16
mo and was not different (P=.09) from the
actual mean FT. Scanned mean REA was
accurate (P<.05) at 12 mo. Absolute
differences between scanned and actual mean FT
and REA were different (P<.05) from zero for
all main effects. Increased level of operator
(scanner) skill did not improve accuracy of FT
or REA measurements, whereas increased level
of interpreter (reader) skill improved accuracy
of REA measurements. There was no
difference (P>.05) between the two ultrasound
units in accuracy of estimating FT or REA.
Scanned measurements overestimated bulls with
less than .20 in FT and greater than 13.6 in2
REA and underestimated bulls with more than
.40 in. FT and less than 12.0 in2 REA. We
conclude that REA scanned at 12 mo and FT at
12 or 16 mo were sufficiently accurate to
characterize groups of young bulls; however,
individual scans were inaccurate. Scanning at
other months was not accurate for either
individuals or groups of young bulls.