Effect of ruminal versus postruminal administration of degradable protein on
utilization of low-quality forage by beef steers

dc.contributor.author	Bandyk, C.A.
dc.contributor.author	Cochran, R.C.
dc.contributor.author	Wickersham, T.A.
dc.contributor.author	Titgemeyer, E.C.
dc.contributor.author	Farmer, C.G.
dc.date	1999	en
dc.date.accessioned	2010-08-24T19:08:51Z
dc.date.available	2010-08-24T19:08:51Z
dc.date.issued	2010-08-24T19:08:51Z
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2097/4731
dc.description.abstract	Twelve ruminally fistulated steers were used to evaluate the effects of supplying a highly degradable protein source (casein) both ruminally and postruminally on intake and digestibility of low-quality native hay. Both protein supplementations substantially increased voluntary intake, organic matter digestion, rate of passage, ruminal ammonia, and blood urea concentrations, but intakes were considerably greater when protein was given ruminally as opposed to postruminally.	en_US
dc.publisher	Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Cattlemen’s Day, 1999	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 99-339-S	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 831	en_US
dc.subject	Beef	en_US
dc.subject	Intake	en_US
dc.subject	Degradable protein	en_US
dc.subject	Low-quality forage	en_US
dc.title	Effect of ruminal versus postruminal administration of degradable protein on utilization of low-quality forage by beef steers	en_US
dc.type	Conference paper	en_US
dc.date.published	1999	en_US
dc.citation.epage	134	en_US
dc.citation.spage	132	en_US
dc.description.conference	Cattlemen's Day, 1999, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 5, 1999	en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid	etitgeme	en_US