Over the years, many different simplified prediction methods have
been developed to predict the temperature development within
mass concrete members. This paper compares calculated temperature
values from three commonly-used concrete temperature prediction
methods to actual temperatures in eight different concrete bridge
members measured during construction. A simple temperature
calculation method, the graphical method of ACI 207.2R, and a
numerical heat transfer method (the Schmidt Method) were used to
predict peak temperatures. The Schmidt Method performed the
best when semi-adiabatic calorimetry results were used in the
analysis. Suggestions are made on ways to improve the best
technique, which was the Schmidt Method.