Abstract:
Residential subdivisions are often criticized for a lack of identity, yet this systematic
analysis of subdivision names and landscape traits finds that identity actually flourishes
in metropolitan Phoenix subdivisions. Identity varies according to the location and age 0f developments, as well as the residents' income level, race, and ethnicity. Subdivision names
with environmental themes, especially height, have increased infrequency since 1973. Higherpriced
areas set the standard for name themes that are then borrowed by middle-income neighborhoods.
Field observations in twelve subdivisions reveal that personal landscape signatures,
common in all developments, are more important for the projection of identity in lower-priced
areas, whereas institutional signatures are more iften the distinguishing characteristic of
higher-priced subdivisions.