Conference:Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 19, 1987 Starting Page:58, Ending Page:60 Publisher:Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
One hundred fifty pigs were used to evaluate the effectiveness of either spray cooling or drip sprinkling to reduce heat stress in finishing swine. In addition, water flow rates of .2 gal/pig/hr and .4 gal/pig/hr were compared. All wetting treatments significantly (P<.01) improved average daily gain and feed intake (P<.05) compared with non-wetted control. No differences were observed in feed to gain ratio among treatments. Drip sprinkling at the higher flow rate resulted in performance equal to that with intermittent spray cooling at both flow rates.
Keywords: Swine; Drip vs. spray cooling; Heat stress; Finishing swine