Effects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder, dry shelf-feeder, and wet/dry shelf-feeder) on finishing pigs

dc.contributor.author	Amornthewaphat, N.
dc.contributor.author	Hancock, J.D.
dc.contributor.author	Behnke, K.C.
dc.contributor.author	McKinney, L.J.
dc.contributor.author	Starkey, C.W.
dc.contributor.author	Lee, D.J.
dc.contributor.author	Jones, C.L.
dc.contributor.author	Park, J.S.
dc.contributor.author	Dean, D.W.
dc.date.accessioned	2010-02-18T20:24:34Z
dc.date.available	2010-02-18T20:24:34Z
dc.date.issued	2010-02-18T20:24:34Z
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2097/2634
dc.description.abstract	Pigs fed from wet/dry shelf-feeders had 6.8% greater ADG compared to those fed from dry shelf-feeders and used 18.3% less water than those fed from conventional feeders.	en_US
dc.publisher	Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Swine day, 2000	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 01-138-S	en_US
dc.relation.ispartof	Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 858	en_US
dc.subject	Swine	en_US
dc.subject	Feeder design	en_US
dc.subject	Wet/Dry feeder	en_US
dc.subject	Finishing pigs	en_US
dc.title	Effects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder, dry shelf-feeder, and wet/dry shelf-feeder) on finishing pigs	en_US
dc.type	Conference paper	en_US
dc.date.published	2000	en_US
dc.citation.epage	126	en_US
dc.citation.spage	123	en_US
dc.description.conference	Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 16, 2000	en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid	jhancock	en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid	kbfeed	en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid	lelandm	en_US