Effects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder, dry shelf-feeder, and wet/dry shelf-feeder) on finishing pigs

K-REx Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Amornthewaphat, N.
dc.contributor.author Hancock, Joe D.
dc.contributor.author Behnke, Keith C.
dc.contributor.author McKinney, Leland J.
dc.contributor.author Starkey, C.W.
dc.contributor.author Lee, D.J.
dc.contributor.author Jones, C.L.
dc.contributor.author Park, J.S.
dc.contributor.author Dean, D.W.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-18T20:24:34Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-18T20:24:34Z
dc.date.issued 2010-02-18T20:24:34Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2097/2634
dc.description.abstract Pigs fed from wet/dry shelf-feeders had 6.8% greater ADG compared to those fed from dry shelf-feeders and used 18.3% less water than those fed from conventional feeders. en_US
dc.publisher Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Swine day, 2000 en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 01-138-S en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 858 en_US
dc.subject Swine en_US
dc.subject Feeder design en_US
dc.subject Wet/Dry feeder en_US
dc.subject Finishing pigs en_US
dc.title Effects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder, dry shelf-feeder, and wet/dry shelf-feeder) on finishing pigs en_US
dc.type Conference paper en_US
dc.date.published 2000 en_US
dc.citation.epage 126 en_US
dc.citation.spage 123 en_US
dc.description.conference Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 16, 2000 en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid jhancock en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid kbfeed en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid lelandm en_US

Files in this item


Files Size Format View

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record