http://hdl.handle.net/2097/4 Search the Channel search http://krex.ksu.edu/dspace/simple-search http://hdl.handle.net/2097/971 Title: AN EXAMINATION OF WORKS FOR BAND: FORTRESS VARIANTS BY ELLIOT DEL BORGO, REFLECTIONS BY JAMES SWEARINGEN, EQUINOX BY ED HUCKEBY, AND PROCESSION OF THE NOBLES (RIMSKY-KORSAKOV) ARRANGED BY ANDREW BALENT <br/> <br/>Authors: Saarinen, Margaret <br/> <br/>Abstract: This document contains historical, theoretical and lesson plans of the selected literature for the Graduate Conducting Recital of Margaret Saarinen. The conducting recital was held in the Performing Arts Center, Victor Valley College, in Victorville, California, Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 7:30 P.M. with performers from the College Band of Victor Valley College. Selections included Fortress Variants, by Elliot Del Borgo; Reflections, by James Swearingen; Equinox, by Ed Huckeby; and Procession of the Nobles (Rimsky-Korsakov) arranged by Andrew Balent. Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:24:19 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2097/970 Title: UHT PROCESSING AND ASEPTIC FILLING OF DAIRY FOODS <br/> <br/>Authors: Scott, David L. <br/> <br/>Abstract: The demand for ultra high temperature processed and aseptically packaged dairy foods is growing throughout the U.S. The technology provides value-added food preservation for many foods including flavored milks, puddings, custards, creams, ice-cream mixes, whey-based drinks, sports drinks, and yogurt. Ultra high temperature nonfat milk, milk, light cream, and 18% cream are used throughout the U.S. by the restaurant and foodservice industries. There are several advantages to aseptic processing and packaging over traditional pasteurization. Advantages include extended shelf life, lower energy costs, and the elimination of required refrigeration during storage and distribution. Challenges are present in all aspects of dairy processing. Major challenges associated with ultra high temperature processing and aseptic packaging of dairy foods include product quality loss, such as age gelation, fat separation, and flavor loss, as well as manufacturing issues such as limited production capacity, potential contamination, slow packaging speeds, and limited shelf life knowledge. This report reviews the history of aseptic processing, principles of ultra high temperature processing, principles of aseptic filling, quality control of UHT dairy foods, and regulations for dairy processors. Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:39:14 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2097/968 Title: Producer perception of fed cattle price risk <br/> <br/>Authors: Riley, John Michael <br/> <br/>Abstract: Risk is an inevitable part of agricultural production and all producers face various forms of risk. Output price has been shown to be the major contributor to the risk in cattle feeding, yet few choose to manage this risk. This study used subjective price expectations and price distributions of survey participants to determine how producer's expectations compare with that of the market. In addition, demographic information gathered from survey participants allowed for further examination as to how these factors effect price outlook and variability. Data used for this study were gathered through survey responses from Kansas State University Extension meeting and workshop participants and other meetings targeted to livestock producers. First, data were aggregated and analyzed at a group level. Only two of the twelve price forecast were significantly lower than the futures settlement price. On the other hand, all but one of the aggregated group volatility expectations was different. Typically nearby contract price risk expectation was underestimated and distant contract price risk expectation was overestimated. Individual respondent's discreet stated price and price distribution information was fitted to a continuous distribution and an implied mean and standard deviation were determined. These were compared to market price and price risk data. Respondent's expectation of price was significantly lower than the market for distant months for five of the six groups. Individual volatilities resulting from each fitted distribution were significantly lower from the volatility measure resulting from Black's model. Demographic data were estimated to show the impact of this information on overall error of price forecast and price risk expectations. Those living outside the Northeast and Northern Plains tended to have larger error in their expectation of price volatility. Larger backgrounding operations reported lower price variance error and selling more fed cattle each year increased price risk expectation error. Lastly, prior use of risk management tools for the most part did not have an impact on error in either price expectation or price volatility expectation. Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:45:52 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/2097/965 Title: Manganese response and nutrient uptake in conventional and glyphosate-resistant soybean <br/> <br/>Authors: Loecker, Jami L. <br/> <br/>Abstract: Glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean cultivars are widely accepted in the United States. Glyphosate-resistance provides many benefits to production agriculture, yet GR soybeans may require some additional management practices. The objectives of this research are to (a) determine response of GR and conventional (CV) soybean near isoline to manganese fertilization, (b) determine nutrient concentration and uptake in GR and CV soybean, (c) determine differences in yield of GR and CV soybean varieties, (d) quantifying Mn uptake when glyphosate is and is not applied to glyphosate-resistant soybean, and (e) determine glyphosate effect on soybean response to Mn treatments. A field study was conducted at 5 locations in Kansas from 2006 through 2007. Manganese soil test levels ranged from 4 to 52 mg Mn/kg. Soybean (near isoline) varieties were planted at each location in a split-block design with 4 replications. Manganese treatments consisted of soil-applied MnSO[subscript]4 at 0, 2.8, 5.6, and 8.4 kg Mn/ha and foliar applied Mn at 0.22 and 0.45 kg Mn/ha. Leaf tissue and whole plant samples were taken at approximately R1, R3, and R6 growth stages and analyzed for N, P, K, Mn, and other nutrient concentrations. Few significant differences were found between varieties for concentration of any nutrient. Overall nutrient uptake under optimal growth conditions was greater in GR soybean than CV soybean varieties. There were no yield differences between GR and CV soybean varieties at low yielding locations (< 3.3 Mg/ha). In high yielding environments, CV soybean yield was greater than GR soybean yield for the 0 kg Mn/ha rate. However, granular Mn additions increased yield of GR soybean but did not affect CV soybean yield while foliar Mn treatments at high yielding locations increased yields in GR and CV soybean. In addition, a greenhouse study was conducted with a completely randomized block design having 5 blocks. Manganese treatments in the greenhouse study consisted of soil-applied MnSO[subscript]4 at 0, 8.5, 17, and 25.5 mg Mn/pot and foliar applications of 0.66 and 1.33 mg Mn/pot. Treatments were with and without glyphosate applications. Glyphosate applications did not alter Mn concentrations or total Mn uptake in the soybean biomass. Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:57:43 GMT